ORGANIZATIONAL ETHICS AND CSR Required Reading For this Module’s Case Assignment, please read Chapter 4, pages 117-154, of the following book in our e-library. Terris, Daniel. (2005) Ethics at Work: Creating Virtue at an American Corporation. Brandeis Uni

ORGANIZATIONAL ETHICS AND CSR

Required Reading

For this Module’s Case Assignment, please read Chapter 4, pages 117-154, of the following book in our e-library.

Terris, Daniel. (2005) Ethics at Work: Creating Virtue at an American Corporation. Brandeis University Press. Waltham, MA. Retrieved from ProQuest ebrary.

For your SLP assignment, please read the following article.

Popa, M., & Salanta, I. (2014). Corporate social responsibility versus corporate social irresponsibility. Management & Marketing, 9(2), 137–146. Retrieved from Trident University Library.

Here is some additional reading material that may be useful:

Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2010, March). Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews. pp. 1-7. Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.

Also, please spend some time researching other sources to help you develop your key arguments.

The following Pearson learning tools should be reviewed to help you prepare for your discussion board postings: 

Pearson MyCourse Tools, (2015). Social Contract Theory.  Interactive Tutorial. http://www.pearsoncustom.com/mct-comprehensive/asset.php?isbn=1269879944&id=22557

Pearson MyCourse Tools, (2015).  Social Contract Theory (Part I). Podcast. http://www.pearsoncustom.com/mct-comprehensive/asset.php?isbn=1269879944&id=22552

Pearson MyCourse Tools, (2015).  Social Contract Theory (Part II). Podcast. http://www.pearsoncustom.com/mct-comprehensive/asset.php?isbn=1269879944&id=22553

Module 4 – Case

ORGANIZATIONAL ETHICS AND CSR

Assignment Overview

A Critique of Lockheed Martin

In this assignment you will be asked to review Chapter 4, the final chapter of Terris’ book, and to spend some time applying your critical thinking skills in evaluating Lockheed Martin’s efforts.

Case Assignment

1.     What do you think about the notion presented by Terris that Lockheed’s ethics program does little to prevent ethical breaches at the highest level of the organization? 

2.     Are the efforts put forth—such as making sure higher level executives participate in training—enough to help executives navigate what Terris calls the ‘ethical minefield’ faced by leadership in such an organization? 

3.     What are some things that could be done to address the issue related to ethics at higher executive levels of the organization?

4.     Terris points out that the company’s program is overly focused on individuals and that it doesn’t really address group dynamics that can impact ethical situations. For instance, there can be a tendency for groups to ‘go with the flow’ of the group decision making process and overlook ethical issues in the process. What would you recommend that Lockheed Martin do to address this situation? 

(Hint: reviewing p. 128 and the following pages – before section headed “Personal Responsibility, Collective Innocence” – of the text might be helpful).

Assignment Expectations

Write a 4- to 5-page paper, not including title page or references page addressing the issue and upload it by the end of this module.

Your paper should be double-spaced and in 12-point type size.

Your paper should have a separate cover page and a separate reference page.  Make sure you cite your sources. 

Use APA style, and proofread your paper.

Upload your paper by the end of the module.

Posted in Uncategorized