american thoracic society policy statementshared decision making W r i t i n g

Overview

For this Performance Task Assessment, you will create a narrated PowerPoint presentation recommending and supporting an evidence-based practice change for your current healthcare organization.

Submission Length: An 8- to 14-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation.

Professional Skills: Written Communication, Oral Communication, Technology, Critical Thinking and Problem Solving, and Information Literacy are assessed in this competency.

Your response to this Assessment should:

• Reflect the criteria provided in the rubric.
• Adhere to the required assignment length.

This Assessment requires submission of one (1) file, a narrated PowerPoint presentation. Save your file as EB005_presentation_firstinitial_lastname (for example, EB005_presentation_J_Smith).

You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft Check area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu.

Instructions

Access the following to complete this Assessment:

• APA Presentation Template

Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the Assessor will use to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.

Rubric

To complete this Assessment:

Create a PowerPoint presentation by addressing the following in 8–14 slides:

• Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.) (1–2 slides)
• Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general. (2–3 slides)
• Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an evidence-based practice approach to decision-making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered. (3–5 slides)
• Be sure to include a description of the PICOT question that you developed for your search, and which databases you consulted.
• Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation. (1–2 slides)
• Describe the measurable outcomes that you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change. (1–2 slides)
• Be sure to provide APA citations for the supporting evidence-based, peer-reviewed articles that you selected to support your thinking.
  

  TEXTBOOK: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN NURSING & HEALTHCARE: A GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICE

  

  Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

  • Chapter 7, “Integration of Patient Preferences and Values and Clinician Expertise Into Evidence-Based Decision Making” (pp. 219–232)

  Time Estimate: 30 min

  ARTICLE: MEASURING RETURN ON INVESTMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES: IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

  

  Measuring Return on Investment for Professional Development Activities: Implications for PracticeOpperman, C., Liebig, D., Bowling, J., Johnson, C. S., & Harper, M. (2016). Measuring return on investment for professional development activities: Implications for practice. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 32(4), 176–184. doi:10.1097/NND.0000000000000483

  • Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

  Time Estimate: 45 min

  ARTICLE: PROVIDER PERSPECTIVES ON THE UTILITY OF A COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING DECISION AID FOR FACILITATING SHARED DECISION MAKING

  

  Provider Perspectives on the Utility of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision Aid for Facilitating Shared Decision MakingSchroy, P. C., Mylvaganam, S., & Davidson, P. (2014). Provider perspectives on the utility of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for facilitating shared decision making. Health Expectations, 17(1), 27–35. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00730.x

  • Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

  Time Estimate: 30 minARTICLE: THE CONNECTION BETWEEN EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE AND SHARED DECISION MAKINGThe Connection Between Evidence-Based Medicine and Shared Decision MakingHoffman, T. C., Montori, V. M., & Del Mar, C. (2014). The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision making. JAMA, 312(13), 1295–1296. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10186

  • Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

  Time Estimate: 15 minARTICLE: SHARED DECISION MAKING IN INTENSIVE CARE UNITS: AN AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE AND AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY POLICY STATEMENTShared Decision Making in Intensive Care Units: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy StatementKon, A. A., Davidson, J. E., Morrison, W., Danis, M., & White, D. B. (2016). Shared decision making in intensive care units: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society policy statement. Critical Care Medicine, 44(1), 188–201. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000001396

  • Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

  Time Estimate: 20 minVIDEO: TRANSLATING EVIDENCE INTO PRACTICE (8:38)Walden University, LLC. (2013-2021). Translating evidence into practice [Video]. Walden University Brightspace. https://mytempo.waldenu.eduTranscript: Translating evidence into practice (PDF)